Write either About Work or Family and Incorporate the Functionalist Theory
All professionals had to face some sort of workplace critical situations. I once had to fire someone to make a point, when that person really did not deserve to be fired. In this situation, I had to handle the emotional set back to the person as well as had to provide the reasons for his termination. If the situation was not handled carefully, the person can disturb his career as well as can disturb the organization while going into the labor courts against the action of firing him. I consider myself in his situation and found it is really disturbing to be fired while performing better than expectations. I convinced the person that how important was he for the organization as well as the problems faced by the organization in order to retain him. I also ensured him as soon as the organization will be able to handle the situation, he will be called back on the same position, and it is a situation under functionalist theory:
“I can recognize the want to respect people of dissimilar racial groups, ages, religion and gender. I don’t appreciate why I should admiration sexual direction, since it goes alongside my beliefs?”
Businesses that go aboard upon initiation diversity initiatives frequently resist with the topic of sexual direction in the workplace. Often guidance itself has no satisfactory reply to the beyond remark, which is made by lots of employees.
Neither the government nor businesses wait for workers to alter their attitude or values as it relates to sexual direction or any additional dissimilarity between people at work. Though, it is predictable that all employees will be held answerable for their own deeds. When GLBT * (gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans-gendered) jokes, gestures, and rumors are tolerated at work, it creates a surroundings that unhelpfully affects output even if there are no GLBT’s present. Such manners can also be offensive to heterosexuals, who are not biased in this way, and many workers who have friends and relations who are other than heterosexual. Each time people say amazing unsuitable they run the risk of making the company responsible. One of my clients erudite first hand what this earnings. Fortunately they responded suitably in the eyes of the professional organizations, thus avoiding a wide examination and negative press.
A latest employee had been hired. Several people heard the rumor concerning his apparent sexuality, counting the new employee. It says, “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” If you are straight person, envisage how much liveliness it would take to work for eight or additional hours a day when you are obliged to conceal your sexuality. That is what this law requires. Incorporating functionalist theory one might feel bound to evade answering the question, or lie. Neither are good alternatives when talking to people with whom you require to expand a credulous work association.